<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>

<rfc category="bcp"
  docName="draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc3005bis-00"
  obsoletes="3005"
  >
  <front>

    <title>IETF Discussion List Charter</title>
    <author initials="S.R." surname="Harris" fullname="Susan R. Harris" role="editor">
      <organization>Merit Network, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
	<postal>
	  <street>4251 Plymouth Rd., Suite C</street>
	  <city>Ann Arbor</city>
	  <region>MI</region>
	  <code>48105</code>
	  <country>USA</country>
	</postal>
	<email>srh@merit.edu</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author initials="R." surname="Salz" fullname="Rich Salz" role="editor">
      <organization>Akamai Technologies, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
	<postal>
	  <street>150 Broadway</street>
	  <city>Cambridge</city>
	  <region>MA</region>
	  <code>02142</code>
	  <country>USA</country>
	</postal>
	<email>rsalz@akamai.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="11" month="October" year="2018" />

    <keyword>RFC</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>
	The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) discussion mailing list
	furthers the development and specification of Internet technology
	through discussion of technical issues, and hosts discussions of IETF
	direction, policy, meetings, and procedures.  As this is the most
	general IETF mailing list, considerable latitude is allowed.
	Advertising, whether to solicit business or promote employment
	opportunities, falls well outside the range of acceptable topics, as
	do discussions of a personal nature.
      </t>

    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>

    <section title="Charter for the IETF Discussion List">

      <t>
	The IETF discussion list, <eref target="mailto:ietf@ietf.org">ietf@ietf.org</eref>, serves two
	purposes.  It furthers the development and specification of Internet
	technology through discussion of technical issues.  It also hosts
	discussions of IETF direction, policy, meetings, and procedures.  As
	this is the most general IETF mailing list, considerable latitude is
	allowed. Advertising, whether to solicit business or promote
	employment opportunities, falls well outside the range of acceptable
	topics, as do discussions of a personal nature.
      </t>

      <t>
	This list is meant for initial discussion only.  Discussions that fall
	within the area of any working group or well established list should
	be moved to such more specific forum as soon as this is pointed out,
	unless the issue is one for which the working group needs wider input
	or direction.
      </t>

      <t>
	In addition to the topoics noted above, appropriate postings include:
      </t>
      <?rfc subcompact="yes" ?>
      <t><list style="symbols">
	  <t>Last Call discussions of proposed protocol actions.</t>
	  <t>Discussion of technical issues that are candidates for IETF work,
	    but do not yet have an appropriate e-mail venue.</t>
	  <t>Discussion of IETF administrative policies.</t>
	  <t>Questions and clarifications concerning IETF meetings.</t>
	  <t>Announcements of conferences, events, or activities that are
	    sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF.</t>
      </list></t>

      <t>
	Inappropriate postings include:
      </t>
      <?rfc subcompact="yes" ?>
      <t><list style="symbols">
	  <t>Unsolicited bulk e-mail.</t>
	  <t>Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings,
	    activities, or technical concerns.</t>
	  <t>Unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject.</t>
	  <t>Announcements of conferences, events, or activities that are not
	    sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF.</t>
      </list></t>

      <t>
	The IETF Chair, or a sergeant-at-arms appointed by the Chair, is
	empowered to restrict posting by a person, or of a thread, when the
	content is inappropriate and represents a pattern of abuse.  They are
	encouraged to take into account the overall nature of the postings by
	an individual and whether particular postings are an aberration or
	typical.  Complaints regarding their decisions should be referred to
	the IAB.
      </t>

    </section>

  </middle>

  <back>
  </back>

</rfc>
