<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.6.17 (Ruby 3.0.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-02" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.15.1 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="PCE IP Tunnel">PCE-initiated IP Tunnel</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-02"/>
    <author initials="X." surname="Chen" fullname="Xia Chen">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>jescia.chenxia@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="H." surname="Shi" fullname="Hang Shi" role="editor">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>shihang9@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="Z." surname="Li" fullname="Zhenbin Li">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>lizhenbin@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2022" month="October" day="21"/>
    <area>Routing Area</area>
    <workgroup>pce</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies a set of extensions to PCEP to support PCE-initiated IP Tunnel to satisfy the requirement which is introduced in <xref target="I-D.li-spring-tunnel-segment"/>.  The extensions include the setup, maintenance and teardown of PCE-initiated IP Tunnels, without the need for local configuration on the PCC.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t><xref target="I-D.li-spring-tunnel-segment"/> introduces a new type of segment,
   Tunnel Segment, for the segment routing.  Tunnel segment can be used
   to reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or
   provide differentiated services.  The tunnel segment can be allocated
   for MPLS RSVP-TE tunnel, SR-TE tunnel or IP Tunnel.</t>
      <t><xref target="I-D.li-spring-tunnel-segment"/> introduces two ways to set up the
   tunnel which is used as tunnel segment: one is to configure tunnel on
   the device, the other is PCE-initiated tunnel.</t>
      <t><xref target="RFC8231"/>, <xref target="RFC8281"/> and
   <xref target="RFC8664"/> has defined how to set up the PCE
   initiated RSVP-TE LSP and SR-TE LSP.  This document specifies a set
   of extensions to PCEP to support PCE-initiated IP Tunnel.  The
   extensions include the setup, maintenance and teardown of PCE-
   initiated IP Tunnels, without the need for local configuration on the
   PCC.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="terminology">
      <name>Terminology</name>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>SR: Segment Routing</li>
        <li>SR-TE: Segment Routing Traffic Engineering</li>
      </ul>
      <t>This document uses the terms defined in <xref target="RFC5440"/>: PCC, PCE, PCEP
   Peer.</t>
      <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC8281"/>:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>PCE-initiated LSP: LSP that is instantiated as a result of a request
   from the PCE.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>The following terms are defined in this document:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>IP Tunnel: Tunnel that uses IP encapsulation.</li>
        <li>PCE-initiated IP Tunnel: IP Tunnel that is instantiated as a result
   of a request from the PCE.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>The message formats in this document are specified using Routing
   Backus-Naur Format (RBNF) encoding as specified in <xref target="RFC5511"/>.</t>
      <section anchor="requirements-language">
        <name>Requirements Language</name>
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="procedures-for-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel">
      <name>Procedures for PCE-initiated IP Tunnel</name>
      <section anchor="overview-of-procedures">
        <name>Overview of Procedures</name>
        <t>A PCC or PCE indicates its ability to support PCE Initiated dynamic
   tunnel during the PCEP Initialization Phase via "PCE Initiated Tunnel
   Capability" TLV (see details in <xref target="tunnel-cap"/>).</t>
        <t>In this document the procedure is only about PCE Initiated dynamic IP
   Tunnel.  The decision when to instantiate or delete a PCE-initiated
   IP Tunnel is out of the scope of this document.</t>
        <t>This section introduces the procedure to support PCE provisioned IP
   Tunnel as follows:</t>
        <t>Firstly both the PCC and the PCE negotiate the PCE Initiated Tunnel
   Capability for tunnel types during the PCE session initiation phase.
   On the PCEP session with PCE Initiated Tunnel Capability PCE
   communicates with PCC to set up, maintain and tear down PCE-initiated
   IP Tunnels.</t>
        <t>The procedure about tunnel state synchronization, PCC local policy
   and timeout process, the session failure process, etc. will be
   specified in the future version.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="capability-advertisement">
        <name>Capability Advertisement</name>
        <t>During PCEP session establishment, both the PCC and the PCE must
   announce their support of PCEP extensions defined in this document.
   A PCEP Speaker (PCE or PCC) includes the "PCE Initiated Tunnel
   Capability" TLV, described in <xref target="tunnel-cap"/>, in the OPEN Object to
   advertise its support for PCEP extensions for PCE Initiated IP Tunnel
   Capability.</t>
        <t>The PCE Initiated Tunnel Capability TLV includes the tunnel types
   that are supported by PCEP Speaker.  Each tunnel type is indicated by
   one bit.</t>
        <t>The presence of the PCE Initiated Tunnel Capability TLV in PCE's OPEN
   message indicates that the PCE can support the instantiation of PCE-
   initiated Tunnels and the types of the tunnels which PCE can
   initiate.</t>
        <t>The presence of such Capability TLV in PCC's OPEN Object indicates
   that the PCC can support to instantiate the tunnel according to the
   PCE's indication and the types of the tunnels which PCC can setup
   automatically according to the PCE's request.</t>
        <t>If PCE has such capability TLV and PCC has no such capability TLV PCE
   MUST NOT send the PCE messages for procedure of PCE initiated IP
   Tunnel.  And if PCC receives such messages it should send PCErr
   message to PCE.</t>
        <t>If both PCE and PCC have such capability TLV they only negotiate the
   types of the tunnels both PCE and PCC can support.  PCE MUST only
   initiate the specific tunnel which both PCE and PCC can support.
   Otherwise PCC MUST send the PCErr message.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="tunnel-operations">
        <name>Tunnel Operations</name>
        <section anchor="pce-ip-tunnel-instantiation">
          <name>PCE IP Tunnel Instantiation</name>
          <t>To instantiate a tunnel, the PCE sends a Path Computation Tunnel
   Initiate (PCTunnelInitiate) message to the PCC.  The PCTunnelInitiate
   message MUST include the SRP object (see details in <xref target="srp"/>) and
   TUNNEL object (see details in <xref target="tunnel-obj"/>) . The TUNNEL object MUST
   have a PTUNNEL-ID of 0 and MUST include the Tunnel Identifier TLV
   with the TUNNEL-ID 0 and the Tunnel Name TLV.  The TUNNEL object MAY
   have the Tunnel Parameter TLV.</t>
          <t>The PCC creates the different type of tunnel using the end point
   address carried in Tunnel Identifier TLV and sends the Path
   Computation Tunnel State Report (PCTunneRpt) message to PCE.  The
   PCTunneRpt message MUST include the SRP object and TUNNEL object.
   PCC assigns a unique PTUNNEL-ID carried via TUNNEL object and a
   unique TUNNEL-ID carried via Tunnel Identifier TLV(see details in
   <xref target="tunnel-obj"/>) in TUNNEL object for the tunnel.  PCC indicates the
   operational state in the TUNNEL object.</t>
          <t>The PCTunneRpt message MUST include the SRP object, with the SRP-ID-
   NUMBER used in the SRP object of the PCTunnelInitiate message.</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
                  +-+-+                    +-+-+
                  |PCE|                    |PCC|
                  +-+-+                    +-+-+
                    |                        |
1) add new tunnel   |-- PCTunnelInitiate --> |
                    |    PTUNNEL-ID=0,       |
                    |     TUNNEL-ID=0        |
                    |         R=0            |
                    |            .           |
                    |                        |
                    |<---- PCTunneRpt  ------| 2) Tunnel Status Report sent
                    |    PTUNNEL-ID=1,       |
                    |     TUNNEL-ID=1        |
                    |           Up           |
                    |                        |
]]></artwork>
        </section>
        <section anchor="pce-ip-tunnel-update">
          <name>PCE IP Tunnel Update</name>
          <t>To update the parameters used to create a tunnel, the PCE sends a
   Path Computation Tunnel Update (PCTunnelUpd) message to the PCC.  The
   PCTunnelUpd message MUST include the SRP object and TUNNEL object.
   The TUNNEL object MUST have specific PTUNNEL-ID and MUST have
   specific Tunnel Identifier TLV.  The TUNNEL object MUST carry any of
   the Tunnel Parameter TLV and Tunnel Attribute TLV.</t>
          <t>The PCC updates the encapsulation parameters and/or attributes of the
   tunnel and PCC sends the PCTunneRpt message to PCE to report updated
   state.</t>
          <t>The PCTunneRpt message MUST include the SRP object, with the SRP-ID-
   NUMBER used in the SRP object of the PCTunnelUpd message.</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
                  +-+-+                    +-+-+
                  |PCE|                    |PCC|
                  +-+-+                    +-+-+
                    |                        |
1) update tunnel    |----  PCTunnelUpd ----> |
   parameter        |    PTUNNEL-ID=1,       |
                    |     TUNNEL-ID=1        |
                    |            .           |
                    |                        |
                    |<---- PCTunneRpt  ------| 2) Tunnel Status Report sent
                    |    PTUNNEL-ID=1,       |
                    |     TUNNEL-ID=1        |
                    |           Up           |
                    |                        |
]]></artwork>
        </section>
        <section anchor="pce-ip-tunnel-deletion">
          <name>PCE IP Tunnel Deletion</name>
          <t>To delete a tunnel, the PCE sends a Path Computation Tunnel Initiate
   (PCTunnelInitiate) message to the PCC.  The PCTunnelInitiate message
   MUST include the SRP object and TUNNEL object and the 'R' flag in SRP
   object SHOULD be set.  The TUNNEL object MUST have specific PTUNNEL-
   ID and MUST have specific Tunnel Identifier TLV.</t>
          <t>The PCC delete the tunnel specified by PTUNNEL-ID and PCC sends the
   PCTunneRpt message to PCE to report updated state.</t>
          <t>The PCTunneRpt message MUST include the SRP object, with the SRP-ID-
   NUMBER used in the SRP object of the PCTunnelInitiate message.</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
                  +-+-+                    +-+-+
                  |PCE|                    |PCC|
                  +-+-+                    +-+-+
                    |                        |
1) delete tunnel    |-- PCTunnelInitiate --> |
                    |    PTUNNEL-ID=1,       |
                    |     TUNNEL-ID=1        |
                    |         R=1            |
                    |            .           |
                    |                        |
                    |<---- PCTunneRpt  ------| 2) Tunnel Status Report sent
                    |    PTUNNEL-ID=1,       |
                    |     TUNNEL-ID=1        |
                    |           DOWN         |
                    |                        |
]]></artwork>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="pcep-messages">
      <name>PCEP Messages</name>
      <t>To initiate a tunnel, a PCE sends a PCTunnelInitiate message to a
   PCC.</t>
      <t>To report the state of a tunnel, a PCC sends a PCTunnelRpt message to
   a PCE.</t>
      <t>To modify the parameters of a tunnel, a PCE sends a PCTunnelUpd
   message to a PCC.</t>
      <t>The message format, objects and TLVs are discussed separately below
   for the creation and the deletion cases.</t>
      <section anchor="pctunnelinitiate-message">
        <name>PCTunnelInitiate Message</name>
        <t>A Path Computation Tunnel Initiate message which is also referred to
   as PCTunnelInitiate message is a PCEP message sent by a PCE to a PCC
   to trigger tunnel instantiation or deletion.</t>
        <t>The Message-Type field of the PCEP common header for the
   PCTunnelInitiate message is to be assigned by IANA.  The
   PCTunnelInitiate message MUST include the SRP and the TUNNEL objects.
   If the SRP object is missing, the PCC MUST send a PCErr with error-
   type 6 (Mandatory Object missing) and error-value=10 (SRP Object
   missing) (per <xref target="RFC8231"/>).  If the TUNNEL object is
   missing, the PCC MUST send a PCErr with error-type 6 (Mandatory
   Object missing) and error-value which means TUNNEL Object missing.</t>
        <t>Tunnel instantiation is done by sending an Tunnel Initiate Message
   with an TUNNEL object with the reserved PTUNNEL-ID 0.  Tunnel
   deletion is done by sending an Tunnel Initiate Message with an TUNNEL
   object carrying the PTUNNEL-ID of the tunnel to be removed and an SRP
   object with the R flag set.</t>
        <t>The format of a PCTunnelInitiate message for tunnel instantiation is
   as follows:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
   <PCTunnelInitiate Message> ::= <Common Header>
                                  <PCE-initiated-tunnel-list>
Where:
   <PCE-initiated-tunnel-list> ::= <PCE-initiated-tunnel-request>
                                   [<PCE-initiated-tunnel-request>]
   <PCE-initiated-tunnel-request> ::= (<PCE-initiated-tunnel-instantiation>
                                       |<PCE-initiated-tunnel-deletion>)
   <PCE-initiated-tunnel-instantiation> ::= <SRP>
                                            <TUNNEL>
   <PCE-initiated-tunnel-deletion> ::= <SRP>
                                       <TUNNEL>
]]></artwork>
        <t>The SRP object defined in <xref target="RFC8231"/> can be used in
   this document to correlate tunnel initiate requests and update
   requests sent by the PCE with the error reports and tunnel state
   reports sent by the PCC.  Every request from the PCE sends a new SRP-
   ID-NUMBER.  This number is unique per PCEP session and is incremented
   each time an operation (initiation, update, etc) is requested from
   the PCE.  The value of the SRP-ID-NUMBER MUST be echoed back by the
   PCC in PCErr and PCTunnelRpt messages to allow for correlation
   between requests made by the PCE and errors or state reports
   generated by the PCC.  Procedure of PCE-initiated IP Tunnel share the
   same number space of the SRP-ID-NUMBER with procedure of stateful
   PCE.</t>
        <t>The &lt;TUNNEL&gt; object is an new object introduced in this document.
   &lt;TUNNEL&gt; object in PCTunnelInitiate message MUST include Tunnel
   Identifier TLV and Tunnel Name TLV.  Tunnel Parameter TLV is
   optionally included.</t>
        <t>The Tunnel Initiate message for tunnel instantiation has the TUNNEL
   object with the TUNNEL-ID in Tunnel Identifier TLV 0.  The Tunnel
   Initiate message for tunnel deletion has the TUNNEL object carrying
   the TUNNEL-ID of the TUNNEL to be removed.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="pctunnelupd-message">
        <name>PCTunnelUpd Message</name>
        <t>A Path Computation Tunnel Update Request message (also referred to as
   PCTunnelUpd message) is a PCEP message sent by a PCE to a PCC to
   update the encapsulation parameters and/or attributes of a tunnel.  A
   PCTunnelUpd message can carry more than one Tunnel Update Request.</t>
        <t>The Message-Type field of the PCEP common header for the PCUpd
   message is to be assigned by IANA.</t>
        <t>The PCTunnelUpd message MUST include the SRP and the TUNNEL objects.
   If the SRP object is missing, the PCC MUST send a PCErr with error-
   type 6 (Mandatory Object missing) and error-value=10 (SRP Object
   missing) (per <xref target="RFC8231"/>).  If the TUNNEL object is
   missing, the PCC MUST send a PCErr with error-type 6 (Mandatory
   Object missing) and error-value which means TUNNEL Object missing.</t>
        <t>The format of a PCTunnelUpd message for tunnel parameter update is as
   follows:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
      <PCETunnelUpd Message> ::= <Common Header>
                                 <tunnel-update-request-list>
   Where:
      <tunnel-update-request-list> ::= <tunnel-update-request>
                                       [<tunnel-update-request-list>]
      <tunnel-update-request> ::= <SRP>
                                  <TUNNEL>
]]></artwork>
        <t>&lt;TUNNEL&gt; object in PCTunnelUpd message MUST include Tunnel Identifier
   TLV and any of Tunnel Parameter TLV and Tunnel Attribute TLV.  Tunnel
   Name TLV is not included.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="pctunnelrpt-message">
        <name>PCTunnelRpt Message</name>
        <t>A Path Computation Tunnel State Report message which is also referred
   to as PCTunnelRpt message is a PCEP message sent by a PCC to a PCE to
   report the current state of a tunnel.  A PCTunnelRpt message can
   carry more than one Tunnel State Reports.  A PCC sends an Tunnel
   State Report in response to a Tunnel Initiate Request for creation or
   a Tunnel Update Request from a PCE.</t>
        <t>The Message-Type field of the PCEP common header for the PCTunnelRpt
   message is to be assigned by IANA.  The PCTunnelRpt message MUST
   include the SRP and the TUNNEL objects.  If the SRP object is
   missing, the PCE MUST send a PCErr with error-type 6 (Mandatory
   Object missing) and error-value=10 (SRP Object missing) (per
   <xref target="RFC8231"/>).  If the TUNNEL object is missing, the
   PCE MUST send a PCErr with error-type 6 (Mandatory Object missing)
   and error-value which means TUNNEL Object missing.</t>
        <t>The format of a PCTunnelRpt message for tunnel instantiation is as
   follows:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
      <PCTunnelRpt Message> ::= <Common Header>
                                <tunnel-state-report-list>
   Where:
      <tunnel-state-report-list> ::= <tunnel-state-report>
                                     [<tunnel-state-report-list>]
      <tunnel-state-report> ::= <SRP>
                                <TUNNEL>
]]></artwork>
        <t>&lt;TUNNEL&gt; object in PCTunnelRpt message MUST include Tunnel Identifier
   TLV.</t>
        <t>Tunnel Parameter TLV and Tunnel Attribute TLV is optionally included
   in PCTunnelRpt message.  In the first PCTunnelRpt message in response
   to the PCTunnelInitiate message Tunnel Name TLV MUST be included.
   And in the subsequent PCTunnelRpt message Tunnel Name TLV is
   optionally included.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="pcep-objects">
      <name>PCEP Objects</name>
      <section anchor="tunnel-cap">
        <name>OPEN Object</name>
        <section anchor="pce-initiated-tunnel-capability-tlv">
          <name>PCE Initiated Tunnel Capability TLV</name>
          <t>The PCE-INITIATE-TUNNEL-CAPABILITY TLV is an optional TLV associated
   with the OPEN Object <xref target="RFC5440"/> to exchange PCE-initiated tunnel
   capability of PCEP speakers.</t>
          <t>Its format is shown in the following figure:</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |               Type=[TBD]      |            Length=4           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                             Tunnel Types                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          <t>The type of the TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a fixed
   length of 4 octets.</t>
          <t>The value comprises a single field - Tunnel Types (32 bits):</t>
          <t>Each bit indicates one kind of tunnel.  Each bit from right to left
   successively represents the value of tunnel type which is 0 to 31.
   The value of tunnel types refer to the registry for "BGP Tunnel
   Encapsulation Attribute Tunnel Types" <xref target="RFC5512"/> assigned by IANA.
   This document only use the IP tunnel type.</t>
          <t>The assignments used by this document are as follows:</t>
          <table anchor="tunnel-type">
            <name>Tunnel Type</name>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th align="right">Tunnel Type</th>
                <th align="left">Value</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">Reserved</td>
                <td align="left">0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">GRE</td>
                <td align="left">2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">VXLAN</td>
                <td align="left">8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">NVGRE</td>
                <td align="left">9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">MPLS in GRE</td>
                <td align="left">11</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">VxLAN GPE</td>
                <td align="left">12</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="right">MPLS in UDP</td>
                <td align="left">13</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <t>Unassigned bits are considered reserved.  They MUST be set to 0 on
   transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="srp">
        <name>SRP Object</name>
        <t>&lt;SRP&gt; object is defined in <xref target="RFC8231"/>.  In this
   document &lt;SRP&gt; is used to correlate PCTunnelInitiate and PCTunnelRpt
   or PCErr message.</t>
        <t>'R' Flag in &lt;SRP&gt; object is defined in
   <xref target="RFC8281"/>.  When PCE requests PCC to create
   the IP tunnel 'R' Flag in &lt;SRP&gt; is set to 0.  When PCE requests PCC
   to delete the IP tunnel 'R' Flag in &lt;SRP&gt; is set to 1.</t>
        <t>Other flags must be set to 0 and if PCC receive the PCTunnelInitiate
   message with other reserved flags in &lt;SRP&gt; set to 1 PCC will send
   the PCErr message.</t>
        <t>In procedure of PCE-initiated IP tunnel &lt;SRP&gt; object carries no
   optional TLVs.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="tunnel-obj">
        <name>TUNNEL Object</name>
        <t>The TUNNEL object MUST be present within PCTunnelInitiate,
   PCTunnelRpt and PCTunnelUpd messages.  The TUNNEL object contains a
   set of fields used to specify the target tunnel, the flags to
   indicate the state of the tunnel or operation to be performed on the
   tunnel and TLVs.</t>
        <t>TUNNEL Object-Class is to be assigned by IANA.</t>
        <t>TUNNEL Object-Type is 1.</t>
        <t>The format of the TUNNEL object body is shown in following Figure:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                PTUNNEL-ID                     |  Flag   |    O|
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   //                        TLVs                                 //
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        <t>PTUNNEL-ID (24 bits): A PCEP-specific identifier for the tunnel.  A
   PCC creates a unique PTUNNEL-ID for each tunnel that is constant for
   the lifetime of a PCEP session.  The PCC will advertise the same
   PTUNNEL-ID on all PCEP sessions.  The mapping of the Tunnel Name to
   PTUNNEL-ID is communicated to the PCE by sending a PCTunnelRpt
   message containing the TUNNEL-NAME TLV.  All subsequent PCEP messages
   then address the tunnel by the PTUNNEL-ID.  The values of 0 and
   0xFFFFFF are reserved.</t>
        <t>Flags (8 bits):</t>
        <t>O(Operational - 3 bits): On PCTunnelRpt messages, the O Field
   represents the operational status of the tunnel.</t>
        <t>The following values are defined:</t>
        <t>0 - DOWN: The tunnel can't carry the traffic.</t>
        <t>1 - UP: The tunnel can carry the traffic.</t>
        <t>2-7 - Reserved: these values are reserved for future use.</t>
        <t>Unassigned bits are considered reserved.  They MUST be set to 0 on
   transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt.</t>
        <t>TLVs that may be included in the TUNNEL Object are described in the
   following sections.</t>
        <section anchor="tunnel-identifier-tlv">
          <name>Tunnel Identifier TLV</name>
          <t>The Tunnel Identifier TLV MUST be included in the TUNNEL object in
   PCTunnelInitiate, PCTunnelRpt and PCTunnelUpd messages for PCE-
   initiated IP Tunnels.  If the TLV is missing, the PCE will generate
   an error with error-type 6 (mandatory object missing) and error-value
   which means Tunnel Identifier TLV missing and close the session.
   There are two Tunnel Identifier TLVs, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6.</t>
          <t>The format of the IPV4-TUNNEL-Identifier TLV is shown in the
   following figure:</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |           Length=12           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                   IPv4 Tunnel Source Address                  |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                   IPv4 Tunnel Destination Address             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Tunnel Type         |           Tunnel ID           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          <t>The type of the TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a fixed
   length of 12 octets.  The value contains the following fields:</t>
          <t>IPv4 Tunnel Source Address: contains the source IPv4 address of the
   ingress node of the tunnel.</t>
          <t>IPv4 Tunnel Destination Address: contains the destination IPv4
   address of the egress node of the tunnel.</t>
          <t>Tunnel Type: contains the type of tunnel (see <xref target="tunnel-type"/>).</t>
          <t>Tunnel ID: Tunnel ID remains constant over the life time of a tunnel.
   A PCC creates a unique Tunnel ID for each tunnel.  Each tunnel type
   has individual identifier space.  The Tunnel ID is allocated on id
   space of the tunnel type and is unique in the same id space.</t>
          <t>The PCC will advertise the same Tunnel ID on all PCEP sessions.  The
   mapping of the Tunnel Name to Tunnel ID is communicated to the PCE by
   sending a PCTunnelRpt message containing the TUNNEL-NAME TLV.  The
   values of 0 and 0xFFFF are reserved.</t>
          <t>The format of the IPV6-TUNNEL-Identifier TLV is shown in following
   figure:</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |           Length=36           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                  IPv6 tunnel source address                   |
   +                          (16 octets)                          +
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                  IPv6 tunnel destination address              |
   +                          (16 octets)                          +
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |             Tunnel Type       |           Tunnel ID           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          <t>The type of the TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a fixed
   length of 36 octets.  The value contains the following fields:</t>
          <t>IPv6 Tunnel Source Address: contains the source IPv6 address of the
   ingress node of the tunnel.</t>
          <t>IPv6 Tunnel Destination Address: contains the destination IPv6
   address of the egress node of the tunnel.</t>
          <t>Tunnel Type: contains the type of tunnel (see <xref target="tunnel-type"/>).</t>
          <t>Tunnel ID: Tunnel ID remains constant over the life time of a tunnel.
   A PCC creates a unique Tunnel ID for each TUNNEL.  Each tunnel type
   has individual identifier space.  The tunnel ID is allocated on id
   space of the tunnel type and is unique in the same id space.</t>
          <t>The PCC will advertise the same Tunnel ID on all PCEP sessions.  The
   mapping of the Tunnel Name to Tunnel ID is communicated to the PCE by
   sending a PCTunnelRpt message containing the TUNNEL-NAME TLV.  The
   values of 0 and 0xFFFF are reserved.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="tunnel-name-tlv">
          <name>Tunnel Name TLV</name>
          <t>The Tunnel Name TLV MUST be included in the TUNNEL object in
   PCTunnelInitiate messages for PCE-initiated IP Tunnels.  If the TLV
   is missing, the PCE will generate an error with error-type 6
   (mandatory object missing) and error-value which means Tunnel Name
   TLV missing and close the session.</t>
          <t>Each tunnel MUST have a tunnel name that is unique in the PCC.  This
   tunnel name MUST remain constant throughout a tunnel's lifetime.</t>
          <t>The TUNNEL-NAME TLV MUST be included in the PCTunnelRpt message when
   a tunnel is first reported to a PCE in response to the
   PCTunnelInitiate message to create the tunnel.  The tunnel name MAY
   be included in subsequent PCTunnelRpt messages for the tunnel.</t>
          <t>The format of the TUNNEL-NAME TLV is shown in the following figure:</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |       Length (variable)       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   //                      Tunnel Name                            //
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          <t>The type of the TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a variable
   length, which MUST be greater than 0.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="tunnel-parameter-tlv">
          <name>Tunnel Parameter TLV</name>
          <t>The Tunnel Parameter TLV and/or Tunnel Attribute TLV(see details in
   following section) MUST be included in the TUNNEL object in
   PCTunnelUpd messages for PCE-initiated IP Tunnels.  If both of the
   TLVs are missing, the PCE will generate an error with error-type 6
   (mandatory object missing) and error-value which means Tunnel
   Parameter TLV and Tunnel Attribute TLV missing and close the session.</t>
          <t>The Tunnel Parameter TLV MAY be included in the TUNNEL object in
   PCTunnelInitiate and PCTunnelRpt messages for PCE-initiated IP
   Tunnels.</t>
          <t>Tunnel Parameter TLV specifies information needed to construct the
   encapsulation header when sending packets through that tunnel.</t>
          <t>The tunnel with different type has different encapsulation mode and
   each tunnel with same type MAY has different encapsulation
   parameters.  When PCE initiate setup of the tunnel PCE can specify
   the encapsulation parameter of the tunnel and PCC will setup the
   tunnel and encapsulate the packet according to the parameters.</t>
          <t>After the tunnel has been triggered to instantiate PCE can send
   PCTunnelUpd message to modify the encapsulation parameter.</t>
          <t>The format of the TUNNEL-PARAMETER TLV is shown in following figure:</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |           Length=variable     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |             Tunnel Type       |           Reserved            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   //                   Tunnel Encapsulation Parameter            //
   +                          (variable)                           +
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          <t>The type of the TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a variable
   length, which MUST be greater than 0.  The minimum value of length is
   4 without any parameter.  The value contains the following fields:</t>
          <t>Tunnel Type: contains the type of tunnel (see <xref target="tunnel-type"/>).</t>
          <section anchor="gre">
            <name>GRE</name>
            <t>When the tunnel type of the TLV is GRE, the following is the
   structure of the value field of Tunnel Encapsulation Parameter:</t>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                      GRE Key (4 octets)                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            <ul spacing="normal">
              <li>GRE Key: 4-octet field <xref target="RFC2890"/>.  The actual method by which the
   key is obtained by PCE is beyond the scope of this document.  The key
   is inserted into the GRE encapsulation header of the payload packets
   sent by ingress router to the egress router.  It is intended to be
   used for identifying extra context information about the received
   payload.</li>
            </ul>
            <t>Note that the key is optional.  Unless a key value is being used, the
   GRE encapsulation MUST NOT be present.  If GRE tunnel didn't use the
   GRE key the PCTunnelInitiate message needn't carry the TUNNEL-
   PARAMETER TLV.  If GRE tunnel firstly use the GRE key the
   PCTunnelInitiate message need carry the TUNNEL-PARAMETER TLV.  Then
   if the GRE tunnel quit using the GRE key the PCTunnelUpd message can
   carry the TUNNEL-PARAMETER TLV without GRE key to delete the
   parameter previously set.</t>
            <t>MPLS in GRE has the same encapsulation with GRE.</t>
          </section>
          <section anchor="vxlan">
            <name>VXLAN</name>
            <t>When the tunnel type of the TLV is VXLAN, the following is the
   structure of the value field of Tunnel Encapsulation Parameter:</t>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |V|M|R|R|R|R|R|R|          VN-ID (3 Octets)                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                 MAC Address (4 Octets)                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  MAC Address (2 Octets)     |   Reserved                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            <t>The definition of the fields refer to <xref target="RFC9012"/>.</t>
          </section>
          <section anchor="nvgre">
            <name>NVGRE</name>
            <t>When the tunnel type of the TLV is NVGRE, the following is the
   structure of the value field of Tunnel Encapsulation Parameter:</t>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |V|M|R|R|R|R|R|R|          VN-ID (3 Octets)                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                 MAC Address (4 Octets)                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  MAC Address (2 Octets)     |   Reserved                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            <t>The definition of the fields refer to <xref target="RFC9012"/>.</t>
          </section>
          <section anchor="mpls-in-udp">
            <name>MPLS-in-UDP</name>
            <t>When the tunnel type of the TLV is MPLS-in-UDP, the following is the
   structure of the value field of Tunnel Encapsulation Parameter:</t>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  Source Port (2 Octets)      |  Destination Port (2 Octets) |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            <t>Source Port: UDP source port.</t>
            <t>Destination Port: UDP destination port.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
        <section anchor="tunnel-attribute-tlv">
          <name>Tunnel Attribute TLV</name>
          <t>The Tunnel Attribute TLV MAY be included in the TUNNEL object in
   PCTunnelInitiate, PCTunnelUpd, PCTunnelRpt messages for PCE-initiated
   IP Tunnels.</t>
          <t>Tunnel Attribute TLV specifies some of the information of the tunnel
   such as metric or TE metric which are carried in sub-TLVs.</t>
          <t>The format of the TUNNEL-ATTRIBUTE TLV is shown in following figure:</t>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |           Length              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   //                       sub-TLVs                              //
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          <t>The type of the TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a variable
   length.  The minimum value of length is 0 without any parameter.  The
   value contains the following fields:</t>
          <t>sub-TLVs: Each sub-TLV has the Type (two octets), Length (two octets),
   Value.  The length is the length of the value of the sub-TLV.
   Unknown sub-TLVs are to be ignored and skipped upon receipt.</t>
          <t>This document defines the following sub-TLVs.</t>
          <section anchor="metric-sub-tlv">
            <name>Metric Sub-TLV</name>
            <t>The following is the structure of the sub-TLV of metric:</t>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |           Length              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                      Metric Value                             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            <t>The type of the sub-TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a fixed
   length of 4 octets.</t>
            <t>The value comprises a single field - Metric Value (32 bits): value of
   metric.</t>
          </section>
          <section anchor="te-metric-sub-tlv">
            <name>TE Metric Sub-TLV</name>
            <t>The following is the structure of the sub-TLV of traffic engineering
   metric:</t>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type=[TBD]          |           Length              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                     TE Metric Value                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            <t>The type of the sub-TLV is to be assigned by IANA and it has a fixed
   length of 4 octets.</t>
            <t>The value comprises a single field - TE Metric Value (32 bits): value
   of traffic engineering metric.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="I-D.li-spring-tunnel-segment" target="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-02.txt" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.li-spring-tunnel-segment.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Tunnel Segment in Segment Routing</title>
            <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" surname="Zhenbin Li">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Cheng Li" surname="Cheng Li">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Nan Wu" surname="Nan Wu">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="14" month="April" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document introduces a new type of segment, Tunnel Segment, for the segment routing (SR). Tunnel segment can be used to reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or provide differentiated services. Forwarding mechanisms and requirements of control plane and data models for tunnel segments are also defined.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-02"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized.  This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2890" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2890" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2890.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Key and Sequence Number Extensions to GRE</title>
            <author fullname="G. Dommety" initials="G." surname="Dommety"/>
            <date month="September" year="2000"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes extensions by which two fields, Key and Sequence Number, can be optionally carried in the GRE Header. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2890"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2890"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5440" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5440" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5440.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)</title>
            <author fullname="JP. Vasseur" initials="JP." role="editor" surname="Vasseur"/>
            <author fullname="JL. Le Roux" initials="JL." role="editor" surname="Le Roux"/>
            <date month="March" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a PCE, or between two PCEs.  Such interactions include path computation requests and path computation replies as well as notifications of specific states related to the use of a PCE in the context of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering.  PCEP is designed to be flexible and extensible so as to easily allow for the addition of further messages and objects, should further requirements be expressed in the future. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5440"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5440"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5511" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5511" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5511.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Routing Backus-Naur Form (RBNF): A Syntax Used to Form Encoding Rules in Various Routing Protocol Specifications</title>
            <author fullname="A. Farrel" initials="A." surname="Farrel"/>
            <date month="April" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Several protocols have been specified in the Routing Area of the IETF using a common variant of the Backus-Naur Form (BNF) of representing message syntax. However, there is no formal definition of this version of BNF.</t>
              <t>There is value in using the same variant of BNF for the set of protocols that are commonly used together. This reduces confusion and simplifies implementation.</t>
              <t>Updating existing documents to use some other variant of BNF that is already formally documented would be a substantial piece of work.</t>
              <t>This document provides a formal definition of the variant of BNF that has been used (that we call Routing BNF) and makes it available for use by new protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5511"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5511"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5512" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5512" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5512.xml">
          <front>
            <title>The BGP Encapsulation Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI) and the BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute</title>
            <author fullname="P. Mohapatra" initials="P." surname="Mohapatra"/>
            <author fullname="E. Rosen" initials="E." surname="Rosen"/>
            <date month="April" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In certain situations, transporting a packet from one Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) speaker to another (the BGP next hop) requires that the packet be encapsulated by the first BGP speaker and decapsulated by the second. To support these situations, there needs to be some agreement between the two BGP speakers with regard to the "encapsulation information", i.e., the format of the encapsulation header as well as the contents of various fields of the header.</t>
              <t>The encapsulation information need not be signaled for all encapsulation types. In cases where signaling is required (such as Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3) or Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) with key), this document specifies a method by which BGP speakers can signal encapsulation information to each other. The signaling is done by sending BGP updates using the Encapsulation Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI) and the IPv4 or IPv6 Address Family Identifier (AFI). In cases where no encapsulation information needs to be signaled (such as GRE without key), this document specifies a BGP extended community that can be attached to BGP UPDATE messages that carry payload prefixes in order to indicate the encapsulation protocol type to be used. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5512"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5512"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9012" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9012" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9012.xml">
          <front>
            <title>The BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute</title>
            <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
            <author fullname="G. Van de Velde" initials="G." surname="Van de Velde"/>
            <author fullname="S. Sangli" initials="S." surname="Sangli"/>
            <author fullname="J. Scudder" initials="J." surname="Scudder"/>
            <date month="April" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines a BGP path attribute known as the "Tunnel Encapsulation attribute", which can be used with BGP UPDATEs of various Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFIs) to provide information needed to create tunnels and their corresponding encapsulation headers. It provides encodings for a number of tunnel types, along with procedures for choosing between alternate tunnels and routing packets into tunnels.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 5512, which provided an earlier definition of the Tunnel Encapsulation attribute. RFC 5512 was never deployed in production. Since RFC 5566 relies on RFC 5512, it is likewise obsoleted. This document updates RFC 5640 by indicating that the Load-Balancing Block sub-TLV may be included in any Tunnel Encapsulation attribute where load balancing is desired.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9012"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9012"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC8281" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8281" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8281.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model</title>
            <author fullname="E. Crabbe" initials="E." surname="Crabbe"/>
            <author fullname="I. Minei" initials="I." surname="Minei"/>
            <author fullname="S. Sivabalan" initials="S." surname="Sivabalan"/>
            <author fullname="R. Varga" initials="R." surname="Varga"/>
            <date month="December" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.</t>
              <t>The extensions for stateful PCE provide active control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) via PCEP, for a model where the PCC delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to the PCE. This document describes the creation and deletion of PCE-initiated LSPs under the stateful PCE model.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8281"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8281"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8664" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8664" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8664.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing</title>
            <author fullname="S. Sivabalan" initials="S." surname="Sivabalan"/>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
            <author fullname="J. Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura"/>
            <author fullname="W. Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx"/>
            <author fullname="J. Hardwick" initials="J." surname="Hardwick"/>
            <date month="December" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) enables any head-end node to select any path without relying on a hop-by-hop signaling technique (e.g., LDP or RSVP-TE). It depends only on "segments" that are advertised by link-state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). An SR path can be derived from a variety of mechanisms, including an IGP Shortest Path Tree (SPT), an explicit configuration, or a Path Computation Element (PCE). This document specifies extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) that allow a stateful PCE to compute and initiate Traffic-Engineering (TE) paths, as well as a Path Computation Client (PCC) to request a path subject to certain constraints and optimization criteria in SR networks.</t>
              <t>This document updates RFC 8408.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8664"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8664"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8231" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8231" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8231.xml">
          <front>
            <title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE</title>
            <author fullname="E. Crabbe" initials="E." surname="Crabbe"/>
            <author fullname="I. Minei" initials="I." surname="Minei"/>
            <author fullname="J. Medved" initials="J." surname="Medved"/>
            <author fullname="R. Varga" initials="R." surname="Varga"/>
            <date month="September" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.</t>
              <t>Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for PCE control of timing and sequence of path computations within and across PCEP sessions. This document describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) via PCEP.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8231"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8231"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source:
H4sIAAAAAAAAA+1d63MbN5L/rir/Dzi7aiPdiowkK16bG6dWluRYdXrw9HCS
TeXDkATFWZMz3HlI1trO3379AgaYBx+W7PhiMbuJZgbTaDQa3T80GphWq/Vg
JQuzse6o7u5+K4zCLAwyPVAHXXWeR5EeP1gJer1EX1EB9/Yg7kfBBF4cJMEw
a/VHOmpN+5r+b+m0wmkroxdaG1vwDtzrPFjpw38u4+Smo9Js8GAlzXuTME3D
ODq/mQLBg/3zlw9WHqyE06SjsiRPs62NjWf4fpDooKNO4zwLo0u1A1cPVq7j
5M1lEufTjoKqH6y80TdwawBkokwnkc5ae8ggEuzHA3ivo/K0FaT9MHywMg07
6tcs7q+rNE6yRA9T+Otmgn/8hm8EeTaKE2BZgaCUCqO0o35uq11oLF6zAH4O
A3snTi6DKPxPkEFrOupVHlzrUJ3r/iiKx/FlqFMspCdBOO6of2lgImij5N6G
wT9GVLjdjydYph/nUYYi2h2FUeAx8KqtzkZhUf+rAIQhdxaqP4mxw/UgzOLE
4ScdhSMg9WxxTv7ZVocOI/+ElvTCSO4tI4px+B9+d07dD1aiOJkAySvUIwW/
g9Zeexy20mkCXWt0LdWXEx1lUuT05e7W5uYz5+rps43i6rvtbffqu81N72qr
uHq2QVegmdGwxAY8fbr11Hnz6ZMn2+6zx5v0plL471arpYJemiVBnxTzfBSm
CgZUjlyrdKr74RAEpAKV6kzFQ6XfZjrCEZKqLMaR2MX/pvl0CmrbNHSpCDCZ
Dm9UNtIq0f/Ow0RTHdejsD9SUGsI8o0HeR9ehJ57926WPD98aCt1DpQcdsKo
P84HmioAZvPpuoIuhaEXBVFfqyAaqEwHySC+jrAhDazCsLsOYajlGRGKNDwE
Eatx3A/GoAXRMLzME1IlBf/DMt3d3baR5SQcDMYarx7hsKcGYVm8M69JhQRQ
3pG+VhlYIeRViqxTL4pIz+QeccdtphswpsgotW1J86AfRKqnweboARGCTkk0
VqfODvbAAAb9N2qgp9kIqzw7VdMgG4ERmgbczCiOWnB3EKNUFY9XNU3iqxCE
PgiHQ51ALSzOVCdXIbRDeimrZSQYo1Az4QabcdQ9PFOnZ6+7rfN9eWkdOCmu
oNqiq9rLCjW7jtV1cEOai+qcT7FhLAsmb5URhaSCtMR5B7pc42MgYFTBti6O
mBK0d6Cx9ev0dwz/SvAdX+H4pTaPwnfvZGR++LCu5OIpXKDSElG+BwMZ7o2A
rYEehhFQGcXXfmOwFnqjqMnI8/CsS4OA5QlX1DkzhjvR+dghzz1PJG43Rkut
ucVAJUpmsD4CB5BMQvIAN2wPVQtk0zEDyzh3+wSkVnmozsGjD8O+2o8uoUN0
Qi/wMPVEC/qUEp+ABCZF/5GhE8v/4QMim911bDX9q8sMA9W2pamhjTBsrrFu
JgVIpEKOtadjm+X3EXR9h7QhGwUZW14Y/GboBtj7iU7zMdn7gIy1Tlkbhkk8
MWq2BFOZK4uCLduXHesnkCOSFTzTUT+YAh/Uh+3apjgUHGczp1lGr23TGps1
0WkaXGLz0MemlaZQO82oGQDjKAFXb16ATQWMdxzkiXpJRNTq6Yvjl2vYOMKA
yFhBweoD+H7wcaSoj9Rp4S5TdQjAKAem2FtrBShTIcxM1cOji7Pzh+v8X3V8
Qn+f7v/vxcHp/h7+ffZq5/DQ/mFKnL06uTjcK/4q3tw9OTraP97jl+GuKt06
2vkF/oOD9uFJ9/zg5Hjn8GG9jMBegMHHgZ5MEy39MQDUmYQ9bvaL3a7a3IbW
/5eAJLB014DEmH4cjW/kErrpRgXTKZgJfA+cCPiTaZgFaBFQmCM0HmBztYzz
bhIDpgBDnZJ9aJxdkKhPrtBzgetF62NfxIc7ODgVE4CKByG6LlAJ6JKgF47D
7KZkFcH/m1oGNwBLw77raYAuDRdWuq4UHgtKVV2w8lpdAZ5/6JMy3AKl3WAq
NT9U54ev1WqqcdRlgGNT1iRxhiCfDx/WjGIflDsIeZiatuLAIWkHPTStte0A
qTlIRHz8AHQYjTx1E4rCGX4otoEeQ8fDoPM6gDmyQxcrz8nukIfox4x/PH7b
roFNNcErz8t7zSn1CeEVZJP63sVTQSpWLDUG6mWYpBlIogcu3AA9dlHcaeBz
LmNun7kzp58Yq4mVAmyXltQAmkOzT+Pv8M8pagJbv5Oo0BdTEn1gbdVutQYU
wFxmkkeiufLmbgEgxBkjvDOeWJErntFlqWsvC7Gz9hj0lKGM0puoP0piMxFb
p7rZW0/jcdi/ITJUcTjR+DqRS9N1gQvc4CGoN9ZgH+qs34bGgB3osYv3zCm+
OswzfAOGdsqehIa6K6CdATyE+QnZWGnQHneNJ21wFkFvHKYjht6NmjHJxWEG
UQQTxz5pSJhYVWRs03WhUZO75K7f4fJnYPbeAJxcxUrIFu2uGVDFmr+wuVj3
7a9vLNaN6E66+8fqpPcvGGagJ9wkIyuyfaZFYlq9Jsk9hx3H3HocuUo0T5nR
1HlNdgeUQPBAXDMzB2R6N54AwWbtB4D0nVcZMbBZx/KMEgDu98LM13GdauxR
MVKLsYvFvklJnETJIIvCkRDThiDOkIxk8V5hSwnO1iJjGY9WD9nACJeZPOQJ
jlThEWhqY5rDC3Xt2ZX2GPWwTSn6wAwNrzm+Z3A6MOj3AceQOYwdvI5yE9rY
+IWaJ1XiDIN1Ns9ijJKAsUHXVqpIKhE0aP0kSZmmWySDvi8D5AMrwudRXFvE
mF2Dx4Ah10awCvAwKSwnd6434/Gd7Q7QCIdUd6L7OrzSwqAlGGaIgvLxgCsE
ckniaR1P45yGkiHDaotWXenaNhH8IoDgeT/u87ouqZB2lKFN/cvyQZqeQrLV
Z1ve9yfoM2myq8RZ9zUaKXxMFbjCTxIjCxIC+wMZuydTzdPGlB88Un7AGUa7
MxjNqPG1OrDRi8KzRwOcgnQDYH03nkzzjPXZsYfGjKB559vmzprbdSbmZMyl
X9TraGq4O+k+O+2qmMdrFS6mCeJEG3Q4vzg+3j9sLi4OA57jW23ixn8HqydS
pE7QeH7cOthDLdmg7quwaKQ8wGgSuPEE9Y6oEGLJbC1IZsPaA3ntOJhofEGk
U+Jn55eCHeelbpDAaxlX5fsi0K1Ei4F2wlw2NCd6yVM/LIJaNo3DSPz/YAC2
NAUFTRJBJLXto2awjlD3gpawi6xoijojNHWqyZoaTTmdZmvl4V1EYIpCC2kG
8uIJrm1CJ4CS0/AyQkUGHAnm0u1S00actfhyR4IB0ZC3Gl6qk0xJ7yQc5use
StWr0MREbZQNeXd9LcslNkM9MCBVYE+59Y5CLCPJ9UJl4SY0l3328cXRi/1T
jjFKhY70La7wx7VnsH7//XeO6Pu/v7bgn+pteVD3xntQlPd1b8CD3fd3UwcQ
q7tJDx6sbK7hIOFwN/c/3G61qu1vtX5QtRwJ/UITn2+sF/Sb+XHKq0XK4++0
KLtQefi1lyy/CP3vW61CRKiMqkW/92przbUTeWoMRarFItVX7ghvc0nhbS7R
uIvpAo2ruynlSe9rnfLFdEDOz3jjnK45GGCsu4T1MXhPNr3ZTbO9q3fVUlXh
pOG62T+79hdL3sYA1ztYwWoGKDkG2bpXLOFOjfv1prbeZyIBtNKAmyOAfkO7
ylHnPJl1frCTZTC9zDNd51W5f1JxmU6g1+0uIPYtWPLAEDLg0g2kGQjoOM+q
jWaPyCteNBy4esY5ZPn/WCPvKMaf0L6bsWjMO9p3MF9e6/GOse9WAzz6n8lE
3dtr5+9PZ6/3MBzszZ9sgHjJqZPyZj63mTqZksWkfVH7bGch35x+o4bj4BKH
PLzAKJOLyOpKj1Y+m01tvTXn+WHJpM8z5yWTKwJ2Ii5FpBTjY77j8Gxq0yyi
ya5+CTa1Fjj/2Uyr6VPXtN4KOn86a3JalF2ovLo3xW7j9k5+Op7buLqbUt6Y
YsWB8CMJFrrxq7AcvAp8+9swsHD4ByZC0C4IikmgMB5NrmnN3aW9W6HtGxcO
oXir8rGaxINQ8sgcqFihXeUbYEY5Chp4LFdW/NfFtHBQHUyqZDaEaT9PU8pz
QhYyjauEehxfEx0TfKBJhhuyHojPAzid6tSuQ1XkemTckFn6meP4LNc2fSkY
pyj/oU4SmvCwINPmLgxZUKAY5g5qPbqFwFh4khUjb3CkSXh5qe1iZml9IrFN
dWUrzWphbq0CrzMeOGsoXVqcjHHlPhgAYRGiN32q45ozCzgsxX7sYOd4p2bu
VXm51v3YaKLrmNO2iZOXPA7UT/nC0aVBK26sOZBIM7ky6Ik4adkwuXqiVo+g
siCLYWIlKyhCiyKw8sJVMM71880NtYrVcjlWYlN2dQrSchLI1tqWUx9dhKn7
4oIMV3jl6PpsfkUPJzqIUsOE/4pVizr1ocVPXHi7IbYoSaaq80cOViOGg3IQ
0EIIXM1KrkA7HIizYfMjiYIdmktVXqrYRXs0Y7ZL+17c212zJO1N9CRG9ihM
WsGNthmnjCwRPXqpV5RWRPavUdedvIOyrI1pcJMfDEb6vsk0/aA6nefq+10e
sq9oyP5Q75P83/deKoHJ1hyHaQav/4RZOx1Tc1M5rrr2uazgLcSJ+nU2jd9m
8GHKECur9WU8OS/GEf7e11Mz+vnD2gy2/CpZTqBMi1fOXcTK+sOMiiw3H1FH
QV4QiWI9dsxqNZ0RDZubv2wWAkqJTJiVCx5v7EQbLKqRPmNXnku0EEjY+8bh
mWmnHXdk2QTNyPK6k9ciRPihTwPnmftXGgx8XaKhxScY+sZZjszxWjzLMdm5
UT7pcQKxrJ2gvfeSUpAjSl7oc46ghLU0JTiEE0yrLVY61GqRW7QucqAcmjWk
IXxiKm3C+x5sWiT3Etv3eOhOzWRWRn4E+kf3RzF6YkwnZ1HY1SPOgwAPwxPM
CuQjd45p4ddksUxnhpJa3dPZtdZR0WUTsDtul1k/lCIGYdApXUMELnWEYmCc
UPRRt7T4XruFIR1RIqO0JsVlRumadBr0G2RCOuSt7RNTw3wsMvHSTf8yzv7O
o+Mvl9nfHZABHYhKYm54GyVqkoUa6EQLYiF3Rbq6SFmzzloXBxbHEk95eQ0A
spAfuC1uArKN/gqzLQpoU+smC1/buNi60Xar55bOYMGCA7/2sqsvAuNlby/l
PW9fgf8YBV0U+csSxKmYFcPzahn3g2NvWoBYWxjzm/mDs6SyXMQ+KNZhdxrX
Q9C68zLDJKaBhlYr0vUtvu20Ah6VZ4PNc4lqFGv+Qs79POLzziMagLDbT86A
LhYYRKdxKKQyea/CYMFBlWH6sSj4e4FRXLlBkwYFQwEHCM8pzhzUFlgckv06
q4bfZrOxJASsQ39z3VXjaKtYd1YG8VS8XLnkMqU3KzRODvUjijPfhbm2GzHM
orbby9+ZHbkx0RYncuMGyGYb8F1jwPeNAXcCcv08oTSmSmCuzbnG1cpMvugM
G+22LBVCNsTnZbp5MggR0aXTOEolJldGBcbNESY0QTXZgBg0uERC2kEZYX2k
r7DSWNBj+M6ivOZBRBZ0GPXeos4A738CA1xyGL6zIAKLOQyPV4N8l+S3zAP3
/l07DLevZgRN5nuLil34SGdhrC4N1BaP4LmeolrY8xPu40W9xK/NtCsewqO/
jH/4KO/QuKTY6B1K0cfFPAPtTarOZmQw13HTlr1WaGmSNKs34YXts6H1GWuY
5dmXnXQ7nklJijhXnea9FE1iVF9/md6caZtZPeJBlRo36G4DePdItAA3kviL
/3N2Sfh7QFoHxwfnBzvn+y2ZTu3udHdeHBwenP9iuoPiGpK+SV2XpnG/2KNk
Z4Qee8V2WxS2ftvHkyZ0adqfFa7KyX83u3ZS3kRitz4dZKkxJqHZgGi2HtmN
sbxZ3LcUGzVjYLPm3lbNvceGxCY8fqy21XdgLv+mnqpny9wjIrT8fJt/iEp5
8RF97PNfz1/s/cbX3vNDHV1mo+fbzq33n5CXEmesfue0XaH2d2e8+DFOmzQ+
sialHkFwTC+jgEMAqvNWVHpMYkMS2yruZzrztt+xDwQQM03ClHfxg+aNDdJp
+Q1ffbyFe5vSNbPfkXZEwR0nURrB3ZswGhSZ7m2nHGGsJLwcUeh1rIeMj9K8
jzvzwitcFgUvQJuJMo6cFPFDWQBBiVjwu4F0Hm+2Sy3yi6cMj42pTPQlOKGE
91Y+fPGjt8Ns34tTOPbcEcRDu+V6C09cqM7+VXkzP21/yVMGbwddlzm3O5gU
79qmoDUFHctbo0tLLw9W3jvMFQpp/3qNIgH9fN+q/jp/9a+x2KlZ/HLV21P2
jQZqrfdVaj+e7lcHi3e1tQS11z8f7hzPpPZ0CWrHr6vc+dSeLUGNziIBK+7S
9Khtbi7T0rfY0h+7Ln8+tWXkZni72Os2UHu8OLV3HWVcNo1GOoXr+UNHCx9+
EK2+iIrhQRvfEzQ3URoCloV7Zp2V5z83Fpzg7mIYrRv2iJQE8LkctFVktCGK
uYxiJBRHvLVtmtmZtjMLefcINyoJS/AvRIjwuBQzr19Eatv977zsa0aiSyN0
8sTtclIFkZWWMBg2JTWby+A+ZgW+lKzAedy606qnzPFPuKMeEZRd+JDZPaex
27hzYYqaKqQd89wZTXQNDHWyBZehu2naTDvwaMU6pe3QniIElT2MtbDXm24T
nOPTdOyCPpMvMWM4IfK0MRwnme5iVrWHQCnKWzD9VSARQE3v8Q4mDBB50JnS
hdrKbi70ZqMWJOMGJnc9pJoP2jPbcXmJo2YVZ92LqSO6d3XTCZ6ltVmnMIBx
y7/Z9SDnfBFkKAYCZ4ryolkWJJc689J0uR8kzGTgg5/55WQ9wDAp1iMZAMEl
Imge+zUZ/iRMIyhXlK3dMdikBaL33kvnsuF7sz4eUI1h9OLBjQfuC2D/8msD
9m46S90PypONkDdP7hLYf/ttbZVKcXbevN+33y4wPZj/+wTTA0emq1vbAszl
2IeWzfMOi3XMyhZHs7RW7Fit26SJr2n36AM5LAndOIa4sIA1leNwqCmDQGJk
RdKBDXGKhS0OhaBBH0x0uVUxn9XjEjH2aBJMpziSzMhzYhJiUhw6xKs9xmTg
bOH3crYao7Zi7kxqlhA+3jnal/j/DjoMN2pSxNfN0QbgNs3GXsesmZwCy6ub
M5HaHc9EY+PtS/oRhLK4yRw8Q9Z09ak/PTtZPXG2q7ZgyIuSnNRGn+TYlBOw
T2DJTfzfnYuVd7/mpb379Qd8SWucE74MgxvAFGYpd9wz//pB9I0skTNpPjDN
0N6Edy665Teay2+1/gZvmDlNB4uk2uWpgAag6HLwS55aP/8HIVhjn2i0TYIb
N2RX2nMsCIHl6xzQYpxi0RNy9pFJJC5OMChvna+kW/jZEOUYYu0maINMK+Bj
IeBhT94SgFA9zc9ZPODASGV5g+yMyeCR6L/kZtWsG0zsukE8e42DQ4XuukGt
kOR1ers/jo2hE2toJIzzeVwYu47rycCgxJDKkI6xvNqWs83sjSfNcOSg+3rb
REJLrJVijiUt+arijuWYoyo9l7DjptuwTx13pI42K6RxnvS12hHnUfl9Tl72
YMYXRhIZq2HoU/EyO7xVGDEXXH758VhQKQnI+rFYmVuV1wJwcmX8ZrOCdHwC
KT9kyyE95myIBsp0K4oHut6Tz+n+UnUDpwS+yTbXq1fpeVU6vV0iXzpBhc75
sAd74EPnzEKrEx1HPRI8sjtyoGt8pROLW1UBXC1HyuQkVBByQbUEkGtOCiM6
qAk40b0KBzngJweYUzpo23e4e5zaIecdIzoIZe+5mzvqxsQlqVfYM4t5CInD
gVRR2t7ZgMMdHpohOCPkWTDcb0ozApcYQg0KXxyBG4ZKwFlAcy1krnWYTxZw
mHZQstu8d5bFT5zl4yefwhCrO5uF35JKIy+Ix2ymP1veoMlvz+dldfOJOIi1
j+Blqd8nlsvH8PK16YvrOmuV5l5fZvLyCfSlCjv//4POx09uAzqfLAk6n3w0
6Hzy0aDzyVcGOhmw3A50Zveg8zOATjfgZtLnqqG2xkS9pYJs1Tja3BAaD855
YbQZITQisHgYrS6EdmyWARYJoFFBV+uLY27MYKKPO9kVC19Lzak+srDvvkCE
eNwWwzYbJXF+SZ8PMeS/Se2Ch7dHzVeVxp6s07pr+RhX0QRgnLNBOT1Wdmkp
PvLXy4PP5h1gUJxj560DOSaAmy+HnpZYnp0YmpbXl+askxbiuc+AZEAxY3LF
Eyu1ehUkYdAba4Pwvjyw3LTc6lq3Gb8vd7n1FkDM9JqDxdbF+hnTcEnDMuEN
MhsVd+ElnFd9RiUfHXdU1qWk1x2NW1keWvs411O7etPsdehEbgcW2rNy/kD/
w+1ZLLl/Ie/U2EdgYj/etzfuha+TugNM0xJO9VkqvuVlPxEYR/SVLJPZBo4w
yfuZ7TJ/T6/sgaKPuRhkBQDwjabFY/Kd7Imr/kGcD/Vo6cBs+naZveXXOEE4
b9bH3RQFIkSokmigsGfQodeLHclumps9C4I+DFACwPazC5zpZHMgGrY6l942
J+ZJullW/bQc6aulZU6mRYFWv0fgsG+2Ew4z7fpjkkAPD0OQk5i4V90z6G2D
TPJb3XbKzDtPq6Gtc51/d+cU3P/5/mlzePXe+9eEVo0ruVsvp5YLfdQmiH9x
SORuwlO1eEbE4+8V6JbPoFXK4plZYbsypmvm5WtHRZL7BUZ5kk+KnR4S3ZJ5
3Lb9yCPu5i4s0tLxrjsICT0iDPfj6b6QJL9SDqH4koPC6yW2wuJAVXbAknGc
2fbYfcmzFfMrMaXOD7di/I++Uavbc0Ljn2Bo/LepvaO2W1S79BOl6uN3nO03
iQPo02AMLhYUl0YLDwPT6/jBRtxL2kMVtJ+mwls9fRPLNvCGT99xBUDBhHdA
iTVFEcJIsAOyWQvlRMemwc04DgYGzJnQGR0bYIK5+AnhYoeVdm8i3Jeva2YA
LBh2yIfXKFkcUasEJun8O/02SwIacfCXB0blG3EjbfYADAS7EYMGdBzHmcR8
Mm66uxG3jRl9Y+QuoEc8gEiUWDcyVOw5r0rGfpipSLLn6QwWNUs54QAzGGW7
lyWEtblRn0p0BqG2n/roHuXsIaZKnUP58qDZY+ZUODskRF/BrdRYruzcRKXC
oSUvNf87DzPnYzZ1LS0d2kOEZldpbbgl524v8QE79sNVGOfp+EZOOlS0yUcp
d0OWOYiJZgV+n9JsAcrYDzuh0aaNZoubbSr+eQz37e32F2C22Wi/fn/0/tT5
p2D09THltT9WJ41m+05MdoPzONrZtRlu4DuambhrPryKt7yKkcs65H3HfPjY
jhK2Q/MNQVJv3uZjd9SSN3u2gVthHcxDOysXHz5U/H743A+f++GDwwcdVyuM
Whd73cXHkPPS/UhaWnMko6FLn8jzNQcfu2kI5TJ3rjkOLx3asS0ZFfKxSipT
ZogLurkQtrS/lOBFsathaj/IfZsw9bqL/9YXDFhL/kdDwNpnrghYp/HE6rM7
X/Airqz++IFSgIKgzUnYx32l5/vmgiddtL+n+PZimvda3lbSpojmzvn56cGL
i/PqmuZ9RNP+qhFNv0GfZeOn6dKGx/L7WlYi50bVQEVmRNSI0hJRNSP8Dmdu
yGVxTi62axV3Q0m8Zt2ufbs3iRSdayLsF9xmxZXn4eRCKuRZ4kX0JsJBajWC
tmLF7rY8+srqm3A61XgGeM0mPe94Ft7fWJaAZ0MYHx+xyTnjJ7XbJqUtFYdt
RAaXbLju7Qn9PrU9abAE0pOkjPUl7pqXZktgVONznxLlyaA4JcqOPKLEyuqM
AXCVdzMMZMevgkbA6NOJ2ZtxPzyc53/M8Cj6eN4A+RMPj7IQyiOEKNXrsTdq
1Jnu5wmeK7grG9CLr85Dx0shakh9gZX/AyjPM941lQAA

-->

</rfc>
