<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="info" docName="draft-du-intarea-service-routing-in-mec-00"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="Service Routing in MEC">Service Routing in Multi-access
    Edge Computing</title>

    <author fullname="Zongpeng Du" initials=" Z." surname="Du">
      <organization>China Mobile</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No.32 XuanWuMen West Street</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100053</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>duzongpeng@foxmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date month="December" year="2021"/>

    <area>Internet Area</area>

    <workgroup>Network Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>MEC, Service Routing</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document introduces a service routing mechanism in the scenario
      of Multi-access Edge Computing.</t>
    </abstract>

    <note title="Requirements Language">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
      target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>The operators are deploying Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) to
      provide services with lower latency to their users. Comparing to
      accessing service in the cloud, the MECs can provide service much nearer
      to the users.</t>

      <t>However, in the current architecture of Internet, we need to send a
      DNS request to get the IP address of the service firstly, and then
      access the service <xref target="RFC1035"/>. It is not the optimal
      solution in the MEC scenarios which are sensitive to the latency of
      service accessing. In this document, we introduce a mechanism that can
      access the service directly without the DNS procedure.</t>

      <t>In the 5G architecture, a UE (User Equipment) need to connect to a
      UPF (User Plane Function) working as a gateway, and then access service
      via the destination IP address.</t>

      <t>In the scenarios of MEC, the service may be accessed within the MEC,
      meanwhile the MEC also provides a UPF Function for the UEs. Therefore,
      in fact, the service access takes place in a limited domain <xref
      target="RFC8799"/>. In this limited domain, we can use a specific IP
      address to directly access the service.</t>

      <t/>
    </section>

    <section title="Proposed Mechanism Description">
      <t>In the proposed mechanism, a UE should have a session with the UPF in
      the MEC. Also, the UE should be aware that it can access the service
      more quickly within the MEC if the service is available in the MEC. The
      proposed mechanism is described briefly as below.</t>

      <t>Firstly, the UE send a normal DNS request if it wants to access a
      service, such as "www.local-weather.com". Meanwhile, it can make a
      destination IP address itself by hashing the URL, and try to establish a
      TCP connection directly.</t>

      <t>Secondly, the UE may establish the connection successfully by using
      the specific IP address, and get access to the service bypassing the DNS
      procedure. If it fails, the UE can wait for the normal destination IP
      address received from the DNS procedure.</t>

      <t>In this mechanism, the IP address can contain some information about
      the service, so we call it service routing in this document. The
      specific IP address is called the Service Routing IP address or the SR
      IP address.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="SR IP Address">
      <t>There are many options for the Service Routing IP address.</t>

      <t>In the first option, we can assume that the UE can receive an MEC
      prefix for the service routing in the procedure of establishing the
      session between the UE and the UPF in the MEC. For example, an MEC
      prefix is 64 bits, and the hashed URL is also 64 bits. In the MEC, the
      server of the service should use the same hash algorithm to generate the
      SR IP address, and the 128 bits IPv6 address should be routed correctly
      within the MEC. Hence, the MEC works like a virtual network node
      containing services, with the MEC prefix as a Location, and the hashed
      URL as a Function.</t>

      <t>In the second option, we can use a ULA IP address for the SR IP
      address <xref target="RFC8799"/>. The procedure is similar to the first
      option, but the SR IP address becomes the format of &lt;MEC_ULA_Preifx:
      Hashed_URL&gt;. The MEC_ULA_Prefix contains a specific subnet-ID.</t>

      <t>In the last option, we can use all the 128 bits as the Hashed_URL. In
      this situation, the UE does not need to receive a specific prefix in
      advanced, and all the services in different MECs have the same IP
      address for the same service to support this quick access.</t>

      <t/>
    </section>

    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8799"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative Referenc">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1035"?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
